After the Department of Justice threatened to indict our client for involvement in an alleged $6M healthcare fraud, we stood firm and our tenacious advocacy ultimately convinced the Strike Force to decline prosecution, representing a complete win for HLA's client.

HLA is pleased to announce the declination of criminal charges by the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") against a healthcare consultancy business and owner arising from an alleged fraudulent scheme involving approximately $6 million dollars in medically unnecessary treatments billed to Medicare and Tricare. We are grateful for our client's unyielding confidence and trust in our representation. In this case, the government laid down their arms before battle--a rare outcome when dealing with aggressive DOJ prosecutors.

Healthcare fraud charges

DOJ's Regional Healthcare "Strike Forces"

The DOJ has prioritized healthcare fraud enforcement for years, and U.S. Attorneys' Offices in each of the 50 states compete for the most notable cases. Accordingly, federal prosecutors often cultivate relationships with private industry, including payors and PBMs, to receive investigative "leads." These leads are investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, and other federal agents and investigators.

In addition to the U.S. Attorneys' Offices, the DOJ operates "Strike Forces" in regions across the country. These Strike Forces consist of federal and state investigators and prosecutors who focus on violations of federal criminal law, including health care fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS).

If you receive a subpoena or civil investigative demand (CID) from the DOJ, it is important to understand the distinctions between investigative agencies, such as the FBI and OIG, and within DOJ itself, related to healthcare regulation and oversight.

Audits Increase Enforcement Risk

The government often relies on specialized knowledge and information available from private industry, and enforcement is no different. As we have written about repeatedly, payor and PBM audits increase the risk that your business will be the focus of a subsequent government investigation.

Audits typically are not conducted at random, and payors and PBMs, including Medicare contractors like Safeguard and Qlarant, are obligated to refer cases involving "suspected" fraud to the government for further investigation.

Accordingly, in the event of an audit, or Fraud, Waste & Abuse (FWA) investigation, it is critical to fully refute any inference of deliberate wrongdoing. Similarly, an audit often provides an opportunity to address any instances of past non-compliance and implement good faith, remedial action upon discovery. In many instances, if done correctly, your response to an audit can alleviate future concerns or foreclose them altogether.

The Government's Investigation

Following a lengthy investigation, the DOJ alleged that our client had "conspired" with a medical practice, pharmacy, and other business partners to bill at least $5.7 million in medically unnecessary medications to Medicare and Tricare. A conspiracy is simply an agreement between two or more persons to accomplish an unlawful objective.

In response to our request, the DOJ provided us with a "reverse proffer" regarding the investigation, which included information on their charging theory and facts that implicated our client. Specifically, the DOJ threatened that our client would be indicted absent entry of a guilty plea.

HLA's Defense Strategy

Because HLA's founding partner previously served for nearly a decade as a federal prosecutor, we understand DOJ's perspective and use that background to shape our defense strategy. In this case, we sought to persuade prosecutors that our client's role in the alleged conspiracy was entirely lawful.

As you might imagine, it is not easy to convince DOJ to back-off completely, and negotiations are not for the faint-hearted. Prosecutors have to be convinced that they will lose in court before they give ground, and even then often use their power to strike a compromise. In this case, however, the DOJ ultimately agreed to not file criminal charges against our client.

HLA is Available to Help

If you are facing an aggressive PBM audit with inventory or other discrepancies, call or email before the audit gets referred to law enforcement. If you are the subject of an investigation by federal authorities, we can help stop charges being brought. And if you are the subject of filed criminal charges, we can help resolve the matter before trial or defend your innocence in court.

Frequently Asked Questions

Top 10 Telehealth Compliance Mistakes You Might Be Making Right Now (and How to Fix Them)

Top 10 list of common telehealth compliance mistakes, with practical advice on how to identify and correct each issue.

Read More >>

DEA and HHS Extend COVID-19 Telehealth Prescribing Flexibilities Through 2025

Discuss the DEA/HHS joint rule extending the prescribing flexibilities for controlled substances. Include: 1) an overview of the prescribing flexibilities that emerged during the COVID pandemic re: controlled substances; 2) the details of the proposed rule, and 3) what the rule means for providers.

Read More >>

Maximizing Reimbursement for Telehealth Services

Offer telehealth providers a practical guide to navigating billing and reimbursement challenges specific to virtual care. This article will delve into coding practices, reimbursement parity, and strategies to optimize revenue by understanding insurer requirements for telehealth.

Read More >>

Common PBM Audit Triggers and How to Avoid Them

Guide independent pharmacies in recognizing and proactively managing specific behaviors and operational trends that commonly lead to PBM audits. This article will offer a detailed watchlist of PBM audit triggers and present practical, actionable steps for minimizing risks of audit findings and compliance issues.

Read More >>