Health Law Alliance is pleased to announce that a self-disclosure filed under Anthony Mahajan’s oversight on behalf of a pharmacy that allegedly dispensed Humira improperly was recently accepted by OIG. As we have noted, OIG self-disclosures may be an effective solution to PBM audit risk.
OIG’s Self-Disclosure Protocol
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (OIG), encourages providers to voluntarily report self-discovered evidence of potential fraud through the Health Care Fraud Self-Disclosure Protocol.
As we have written about in detail, a discrepant PBM audit may permit providers to learn about and resolve potential liabilities to government healthcare programs through the OIG self-disclosure process.
In short, self-disclosure often presents an excellent opportunity for providers to limit their exposure under administrative, civil, and maybe even criminal law, but the determination whether to make such a voluntary disclosure is extremely complex and must be carefully vetted by experienced healthcare defense attorneys.
The Pharmacy’s Self-Disclosure
In this case, following a PBM audit that identified discrepancies, our attorneys worked closely with the pharmacy to determine whether a self-disclosure was advisable.
The analysis is highly dependent on the specific facts of each case, and a collaborative decision was made that a self-disclosure would be the most effective manner in which to resolve potential liabilities under the False Claims Act and Civil Monetary Penalties law.
Accordingly, following a submission made pursuant to the Self-Disclosure Protocol, Delmar Pharmacy agreed to pay $218,129.26 for allegedly submitting claims to Medicare for Humira for a patient that was delivered by Delmar Pharmacy but not dispensed by the pharmacy.
HLA Specializes in PBM Audit Defense and OIG Self-Disclosures
PBM audits often target high-reimbursing products, such as Humira, and the cost of such products means that a provider’s liability can be extremely high if there are errors. OIG’s acceptance of the self-disclosure, however, effectively limits the pharmacy’s liability for the claims at issue.
In short, PBM audits may identify potential areas in which providers can use OIG’s Self-Disclosure Protocol to limit their exposure on government claims.
At Health Law Alliance, our experienced healthcare defense attorneys are specialists in all relevant self-disclosure protocols and procedures. Indeed, our attorneys possess the background and experience necessary to guide clients through these complex decisions and assist with each step of the self-disclosure process. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Common PBM Audit Triggers and How to Avoid Them
Guide independent pharmacies in recognizing and proactively managing specific behaviors and operational trends that commonly lead to PBM audits. This article will offer a detailed watchlist of PBM audit triggers and present practical, actionable steps for minimizing risks of audit findings and compliance issues.
Read More >>Navigating Informed Consent Requirements in Telehealth: A Provider’s Guide
We examine the complex requirements and risks associated with informed consent for telehealth providers. The article provides actionable advice on navigating the regulatory landscape and practical steps to ensure legal compliance and patient safety.
Read More >>Pennsylvania Board Closes Investigation of HLA Client with No Action
Telemedicine business models may prompt regulatory scrutiny, including board investigations. In this case, HLA's experienced defense attorneys successfully resolved a three-year, multi-state investigation with no licensing or other implications.
Read More >>Department of Justice Declines to Prosecute HLA Client for Alleged $6M Fraud
After the Department of Justice threatened to indict our client for involvement in an alleged $6M healthcare fraud, we stood firm and our tenacious advocacy ultimately convinced the Strike Force to decline prosecution, representing a complete win for HLA's client.
Read More >>