Health Law Alliance is pleased to announce that a “fraud” self-disclosure filed under Anthony Mahajan’s oversight was recently accepted into OIG’s self-disclosure program, effectively limiting the provider’s liability for alleged improper billing.
OIG’s Self-Disclosure Protocol
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (OIG), encourages providers to voluntarily report self-discovered evidence of potential fraud through the Health Care Fraud Self-Disclosure Protocol.
As we have written about in detail, a discrepant PBM audit may permit providers to learn about and resolve potential liabilities to government healthcare programs through the OIG self-disclosure process. Please read our article, “PBM Audit Strategy: Potential Windows of Opportunity,” available HERE, to learn more.
In short, self-disclosure often presents an excellent opportunity for providers to limit their exposure under administrative, civil, and maybe even criminal law, but the determination whether to make such a voluntary disclosure is extremely complex and must be carefully vetted by experienced healthcare defense attorneys.
The Provider’s OIG Disclosure
Per OIG’s announcement, following a self-disclosure submitted pursuant to the Self-Disclosure Protocol, Shore Orthopaedic University Associates, P.A., Charles N. Krome, D.O., and OrthoNJ, LLC, agreed to pay $333,645.83 for allegedly submitting claims to federal health care programs using code Q4206 for the use of Fluid Flow, an amniotic fluid growth factor injection product that treats orthopedic patients, to treat conditions which were not approved by Medicare.
In short, billing Medicare for products used to treat unapproved conditions exposes a provider to significant potential consequences. In this case, the decision was made to self-disclose after extensive consideration of many factors, including the calculation of damages, minimum settlement amounts, the conduct at issue, and the potential that the disclosure would not be accepted by OIG.
HLA Specializes in OIG Self-Disclosures
At Health Law Alliance, our experienced healthcare defense attorneys are specialists in all relevant self-disclosure protocols and procedures. Indeed, our attorneys possess the background and experience necessary to provide guidance and legal advice related to self-disclosures and assist with each step of the self-disclosure process. Contact us today for a free consultation.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Understanding UPIC Audits: A Guide for Healthcare Providers, Pharmacies, and Medical Practices
UPIC audits are serious government probes into suspected Medicare and Medicaid billing errors that can quickly turn from a simple paperwork check into a business-ending disaster, leading to frozen payments, massive fines, or criminal charges. Because the stakes are so high, healthcare providers use specialized lawyers to fight unfair findings, protect their licenses, and stop the government from escalating the case.
Read More >>CMS Imposes Nationwide Moratorium on Hospice and Home Health Enrollments: A Major Escalation in the J.D. Vance Task Force Crackdown
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has imposed a six-month nationwide moratorium on new hospice and home health provider enrollments. While intended to combat a multi-billion-dollar fraud problem, the move is expected to trigger intense audits for existing providers in states across the country.
Read More >>Texas Moves to Rein in Ketamine Therapy—And Other States are Likely Next
The regulatory environment surrounding ketamine therapy is entering a new phase of maturity and enforcement. Recently, the Texas Medical Board published proposed regulations governing ketamine therapy, one of the first comprehensive regulatory frameworks in the country.
Read More >>California Hospice Fraud Crackdown: What it Means for Providers & How to Protect Your Business
California’s hospice fraud crackdown is only the beginning of what CMS and Medi-Cal regulators have claimed will be many more cases brought against hospice facilities and home health agencies. Providers who do not timely respond to a suspension or revocation may waive important rights. Act now to protect your business and reputation from governmental overreach based on data mining and other unreliable sources.
Read More >>