Frequently Asked Questions

Health Law Alliance is publishing this alert to inform pharmacies and providers of a significant enforcement trend that could have serious implications for your business operations. ESI has drastically increased the number of audits it conducts of telehealth relationships, including providers that have contractual relationships with a provider named EZScripts. If you are doing business with EZScripts or other telehealth platforms, you will be subject to increased scrutiny from ESI and other PBMs.

Claim Phishing Audits on the Rise

Telehealth platforms often use pharmacies' National Provider Identifier (NPI) number to run "test" claims, often referred to as benefits eligibility checks.

PBMs and other entities involved in the claims adjudication process, such as McKesson's RelayHealth "switch," typically use "terms and conditions" and other contractual provisions to prohibit these transmissions.

ESI is now attempting to recoup on claims that are associated with these eligibility checks, irrespective that the claims are reversed and not paid. Specifically, ESI is demanding that pharmacies repay the entire amount at issue, meaning the entire dollar value arising from both paid and test claims.

This situation is deeply concerning. ESI is not only reclaiming all reimbursements made to these pharmacies, but also seeking to recover the monetary value of test claims for which pharmacies were never reimbursed, placing the financial stability of numerous pharmacies in jeopardy.

We Defend You Against ESI

If your pharmacy has done business with telehealth platforms such as Noble or EZScripts, and you have received an audit notice from ESI, we strongly urge you to contact us immediately. Our experienced PBM audit attorneys will provide you with a free consultation to discuss your options and provide the legal guidance necessary to protect your pharmacy from potentially devastating financial repercussions. Schedule a free consultation now.

MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

Get a Free Case REVIEW

100% Confidential & Secure. Your details are safe with us.

We'll speak soon!

In the meantime, why not find out more about us or visit our blog.

Alternatively, give us a call at (800) 345 - 4125

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

How DME Suppliers Can Maintain Compliance with Medicare Enrollment Requirements

If you are a Durable Medical Equipment (DME) supplier and you are fearful of being scrutinized by CMS or the National Provider Enrollment contractors for violating the onerous Medicare enrollment standards, we hope this article will help. It lays out the essential steps to maintain compliance with Medicare's enrollment requirements. We break down the complex regulations surrounding Medicare enrollment standards, covering everything from initial enrollment and accreditation to revalidation and reporting changes, and tells providers to reach out to Health Law Alliance if they are seeking advice.

Read More >>

OIG Issues Advisory Opinion 25-03, A Roadmap for Compliant Telehealth Staffing Models

On June 6, 2025, the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General issued Advisory Opinion 25-03, offering key compliance guidance for telehealth arrangements involving the leasing of health care providers and other administrative services to a physician-owned professional corporation (PC). Learn more about the opinion and what it tells us about the future of telehealth regulatory compliance.

Read More >>

HLA Wins Full Reversal of PBM Audit Findings for Maryland Pharmacy

Health Law Alliance achieved full reversal of final audit findings for a Maryland pharmacy—just one of numerous victories our attorneys has achieved for our clients. Learn more about the stunning reversal and how Health Law Alliance’s tenacious advocacy can help your pharmacy in PBM disputes.

Read More >>

HLA Attorney Anthony Mahajan Secures Major Victory Over Cardinal as Federal Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Independent Pharmacies

Health Law Alliance secured a major win for independent pharmacies with the dismissal of Cardinal Health’s lawsuit, exposing it as a baseless attempt to intimidate smaller providers. This outcome reinforces the firm’s commitment to protecting healthcare businesses from corporate overreach.

Read More >>