
SafeGuard Services, LLC is a private company under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to review and investigate claims submitted to government payors for potential fraud, waste, and abuse. It is critical that providers understand their rights because Safeguard's investigators are using surprise visits and intimidation tactics to obtain information to which they are not legally entitled.
CMS Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPIC)
UPICs perform fraud, waste, and abuse detection activities for government claims processed in the United States.
Specifically, UPICs monitor Medicare Parts A, B, Durable Medical Equipment (DME), Home Health and Hospice (HH+H), and Medicaid claims.
SafeGuard is a UPIC
UPICs operate in five geographies: Qlarant operates in the Western and Southwestern areas; CoventBridge Group in the Mid-Western region; and SafeGuard in the Northeastern and Southeastern regions.
SafeGuard is contracted with CMS to screen investigative "leads" from data analysis, complaints, tips, social media, and law enforcement. SafeGuard will then investigate those leads that warrant further attention.
SafeGuard Investigations & Audits
An investigation or audit is the formal review of suspect claims to establish evidence that potentially fraudulent activities or other improper payments have occurred.
Among other techniques, SafeGuard investigations may include: contact with the provider via telephone or on-site visit; beneficiary interviews; interviews of employees or associates of the provider; medical record requests and reviews; and recommendations regarding administrative action.
SafeGuard employs numerous "fraud investigators" who typically have prior experience in claims audits or law enforcement. It is important to remember, however, that SafeGuard investigators are ordinary citizens and do not have the authority of a badge or the privileges under law reserved for law enforcement officers.
SafeGuard May Refer to Law Enforcement
Government law enforcement agencies often work with SafeGuard. For example, law enforcement may request assistance from SafeGuard in conducting a review of Medicaid claims data. In addition, SafeGuard may share information on a provider with law enforcement without notice to the provider.
All UPIC referrals of potential fraud are reviewed by the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS-OIG) for coordination with the State's Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. If the case is declined by law enforcement, the State Medicaid Agency may commence administrative proceedings.
Do Not Let SafeGuard Infringe Your Rights
Importantly, SafeGuard is not authorized under law to investigate anyone. Rather, their authority is contractually delegated by CMS, which is itself not a law enforcement agency. Yet, SafeGuard investigators are using traditional law enforcement tactics to scare providers into giving them information voluntarily. Do not be intimidated. In many instances, Safeguard employees are not entitled to the information requested.
For example, SafeGuard investigators often conduct surprise visits to a provider using "show of force" methods. This involves numerous SafeGuard investigators arriving unannounced at a provider's office, typically early morning when clerical and administrative staff are opening. Think about that: are your support staff trained on how to respond if two burly men and a sharply dressed female barge in the door, say they are acting on behalf of the federal government, and demand records on the spot? Probably not.
Just as importantly, do you know your rights when it comes to those demands? For example, are SafeGuard contractors entitled to obtain records that relate to non-government claims? Are you required to answer their questions? What are the consequences if you refuse to provide information? If you think SafeGuard is going to help you understand these issues, think again.
In short, providers should have an audit protection plan in place before they need it. Such a plan involves, at a minimum, education, staff training, and even mock drills to prepare for something you hope will never happen. That's insurance well-spent.
HLA is Available to Help
If you are contemplating an audit protection plan or would like assistance implementing one, call or email for additional details.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Building an Audit-Proof Documentation System for Your DME Supplier Business
In a CMS audit, your documentation is your only defense. A missing signature or an incomplete progress note can lead to a costly overpayment demand. Is your record-keeping system truly protecting you? This article provides a blueprint for creating an audit-proof documentation system. We cover everything from intake checklists to monthly note requirements for wound care supplies, helping you ensure every claim is fully supported and ready for scrutiny.
Read More >>Health Law Alliance Successfully Sues the DEA and its Administrator, Terrance Cole, in Federal Court to Lift Immediate Suspension Order
Health Law Alliance is proud to announce a major victory in federal court, where it successfully secured the immediate lifting of a DEA suspension against a Florida community pharmacy, restoring its full authority to dispense controlled substances. This outcome ensures uninterrupted patient care and underscores the firm’s commitment to protecting healthcare providers from government overreach.
Read More >>RPM Roundup: Compliance Insights from Recent Remote Patient Monitoring Settlements
Federal enforcement actions are increasingly focused on remote patient monitoring (RPM) services. In this article, we break down two recent settlements involving RPM companies—Health Wealth Safe and Capital Health—and discuss key compliance takeaways for telehealth providers.
Read More >>Ketamine Clinics & Compounders Now the Focus of Increased DEA Enforcement
The DEA is increasingly targeting ketamine providers with record-keeping inspections and audits, making expert Medicare and DEA compliance defense essential to avoid steep fines and license risks.
Read More >>