Frequently Asked Questions

In a significant win for independent pharmacies, Health Law Alliance has secured the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Cardinal Health, Inc. (Cardinal), a multinational corporation, against our clients, several independent pharmacies and pharmacy owners located in Texas, New Jersey, and New York. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted dismissal of Cardinal’s amended complaint pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The dismissal comes after Health Law Alliance filed a comprehensive motion to dismiss, challenging the merits of Cardinal's case. Our motion argued that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants, that Cardinal had failed to state a valid claim for relief, and that the defendants were improperly joined together in a single lawsuit.

Cardinal filed its original complaint last December in state court in Ohio, positing baseless allegations of breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, and conspiracy by Defendants, arising out of their Independent Pharmacy Returns Program. After the case was removed to federal court, Health Law Alliance moved to dismiss the complaint. After numerous stalling attempts to stave off dismissal of its baseless action, Cardinal finally voluntarily consented to dismissal of its complaint by the Court.

Health Law Alliance Wins Dismissal of Cardinal Health Lawsuit

This lawsuit represents a classic example of a large corporation attempting to leverage its size and resources to intimidate and extract profits from smaller, independent pharmacies. Cardinal Health, headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, engaged in blatant forum shopping, filing the lawsuit in its home state in an attempt to gain an unfair advantage. This calculated move was designed to inconvenience and financially strain the defendants, who are located hundreds of miles away, in the hopes of forcing a quick settlement and boosting their shareholder value. Cardinal’s complaint attempted to lump together a disparate group of defendants in a baseless legal action. Our attorneys meticulously dismantled Cardinal Health's arguments, exposing the complaint's deficiencies and the plaintiff's transparent attempt to manipulate the legal system.

The voluntary dismissal by Cardinal Health after our motion to dismiss was filed speaks volumes. It is a tacit admission of the weakness of their case and a victory for every independent pharmacy that has been targeted by the predatory tactics of pharmaceutical wholesalers.

This outcome is not just a win for our clients; it is a testament to the principle that justice is not determined by the size of a litigant's bank account. Health Law Alliance remains steadfast in its commitment to defending the rights of healthcare providers and suppliers against the overreach of powerful corporations and government agencies. We are proud to have delivered this result for our clients, and will continue to fight to ensure a level playing field for businesses in the healthcare industry.

MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

Get a Free Case REVIEW

100% Confidential & Secure. Your details are safe with us.

We'll speak soon!

In the meantime, why not find out more about us or visit our blog.

Alternatively, give us a call at (800) 345 - 4125

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

DOJ Targets Florida Dermatology Practices’ Wound Care Coding: Don’t Let Your Practice Go It Alone

Earlier this year, the DOJ announced a settlement with Florida dermatology practices over allegations of false wound care claims submitted to Medicare. Learn more about the settlement and how Health Law Alliance can protect your wound care practice before regulators come knocking.

Read More >>

When a Wound Care Audit Hits, Call Counsel First: How Specialized Attorneys Protect Your Practice

Medicare is intensifying scrutiny of wound care, OIG’s work plan spotlights skin-substitutes and related services, while CMS’s CERT program still finds sizable fee-for-service improper payments - so a targeted audit can escalate quickly to payment suspensions and referrals if mishandled.

Read More >>

When Inventory Discrepancies Become Audit Nightmares: Understanding One of the Most Common and Costly Audit Findings

Inventory reconciliation is one of the most scrutinized areas in PBM and payer audits and even small discrepancies can trigger major financial, reputational, and regulatory fallout.

Read More >>

Collateral Consequences of PBM Audits: What Pharmacies Need to Know

PBM audits can quickly escalate from routine reviews into high-stakes enforcement actions with lasting financial, reputational, and regulatory consequences for pharmacies.

Read More >>