In a significant win for independent pharmacies, Health Law Alliance has secured the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Cardinal Health, Inc. (Cardinal), a multinational corporation, against our clients, several independent pharmacies and pharmacy owners located in Texas, New Jersey, and New York. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted dismissal of Cardinal’s amended complaint pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The dismissal comes after Health Law Alliance filed a comprehensive motion to dismiss, challenging the merits of Cardinal's case. Our motion argued that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants, that Cardinal had failed to state a valid claim for relief, and that the defendants were improperly joined together in a single lawsuit.
Cardinal filed its original complaint last December in state court in Ohio, positing baseless allegations of breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, and conspiracy by Defendants, arising out of their Independent Pharmacy Returns Program. After the case was removed to federal court, Health Law Alliance moved to dismiss the complaint. After numerous stalling attempts to stave off dismissal of its baseless action, Cardinal finally voluntarily consented to dismissal of its complaint by the Court.
This lawsuit represents a classic example of a large corporation attempting to leverage its size and resources to intimidate and extract profits from smaller, independent pharmacies. Cardinal Health, headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, engaged in blatant forum shopping, filing the lawsuit in its home state in an attempt to gain an unfair advantage. This calculated move was designed to inconvenience and financially strain the defendants, who are located hundreds of miles away, in the hopes of forcing a quick settlement and boosting their shareholder value. Cardinal’s complaint attempted to lump together a disparate group of defendants in a baseless legal action. Our attorneys meticulously dismantled Cardinal Health's arguments, exposing the complaint's deficiencies and the plaintiff's transparent attempt to manipulate the legal system.
The voluntary dismissal by Cardinal Health after our motion to dismiss was filed speaks volumes. It is a tacit admission of the weakness of their case and a victory for every independent pharmacy that has been targeted by the predatory tactics of pharmaceutical wholesalers.
This outcome is not just a win for our clients; it is a testament to the principle that justice is not determined by the size of a litigant's bank account. Health Law Alliance remains steadfast in its commitment to defending the rights of healthcare providers and suppliers against the overreach of powerful corporations and government agencies. We are proud to have delivered this result for our clients, and will continue to fight to ensure a level playing field for businesses in the healthcare industry.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
California Hospice Fraud Crackdown: What it Means for Providers & How to Protect Your Business
California’s hospice fraud crackdown is only the beginning of what CMS and Medi-Cal regulators have claimed will be many more cases brought against hospice facilities and home health agencies. Providers who do not timely respond to a suspension or revocation may waive important rights. Act now to protect your business and reputation from governmental overreach based on data mining and other unreliable sources.
Read More >>The WISeR Model: A New Era of Prior Authorization and Audit Risks for Wound Care
On January 1, 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) officially launched the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model. This initiative is not just another administrative hurdle; it is a technology-driven enforcement overhaul aimed directly at the wound care industry.
Read More >>OMIG Audit Defense New York: What the 2026 Work Plan Means for Providers
Every year, the New York Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG) releases its Work Plan outlining enforcement priorities. The 2026 plan sends a clear signal that Medicaid providers in New York are entering a far more aggressive enforcement environment.
Read More >>PBM Member Denial Audit Findings: A Growing Threat to Pharmacies
Pharmacies undergoing a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) audit are typically prepared to address inventory discrepancies and documentation issues. What many are not prepared for, however, is the increasing use of PBM member denial findings, allegations that a patient claims they did not receive and/or did not authorize the dispensing of a medication for which a claim was submitted.
Read More >>
