
Given a combination of economic and political factors, HLA previously predicted an uptick in the frequency and intensity of pharmacy audits in 2024. Unfortunately, HLA's predictions appear to be spot-on, and the information we are receiving from clients indicates that PBMs are terminating network pharmacies based on minor and inconsequential audit violations at a higher rate than ever before. In addition, a late December 2023 announcement from the Department of Health & Human Services ("OIG"), confirms that the "feds" are now prioritizing pharmacy audit enforcement.
OIG Oversees the Medicare & Medicaid Programs
OIG is one of the largest federal agencies and is responsible for maximizing the efficiency of government healthcare programs. Among other responsibilities, OIG ensures the programs operate efficiently by policing fraud, waste and abuse, including the submission of false claims, kickbacks for referrals, medical identity theft, and abuse in nursing homes.
Each year, OIG establishes priority areas for enforcement, with certain probes conducted by the Office of Audit Services. These efforts are publicized in OIG's Work Plan, which is updated monthly. OIG focuses on those areas it believes are most in need of attention.
OIG's 2024 Work Plan Prioritizes Inventory Audits
In December 2023, OIG updated its workplan to include "Audits of Pharmacy Support for Prescription Drug Event Data." When pharmacies submit claims for reimbursement, they are contained in a Prescription Drug Event (PDE) record that is relied on by the government and plan sponsors for adjudication. The PDE contains various data elements, including prescription drug costs and payment data that enables CMS to make Medicare and Medicaid payments.
Specifically, OIG announced that it will conduct audits to "determine whether PDE records were adequately supported by inventory purchases and complied with applicable Federal requirements." In other words, in addition to MCOs, PBMs, and CMS auditors, now a federal agency is planning to conduct inventory audits directly. Here is OIG's announcement:

Inventory Discrepancies are Mostly Trivial
HLA has published numerous articles on the defense of inventory audits, which you can access HERE and HERE. In summary, inventory shortfalls are commonplace due to the complexities of pharmacy practice. Accordingly, the federal government's focus on pharmacy inventory audits appears misguided.
For example, where is the compelling federal interest in whether a diabetic failed to pick-up his or her insulin? Or a patient had enough doses remaining on an inhaler to skip the refill? As a long-time, former public servant for the federal government, I always understood that the focus should be on the most meaningful and impactful issues. "Don't make a federal case out of it," is a saying for people blowing things out of proportion. Now, however, it seems the government is making a federal case out of trivial matters.
HLA Specializes in Audit Defense
Politics aside, the consequences of any type of failed audit can be severe, including recoupments, network sanctions, licensing board issues, and even criminal prosecution. Our experienced healthcare defense attorneys have a demonstrated track-record of highly successful outcomes in these cases, including the outright dismissal of criminal indictments and settlements for fractions of the claims paid with no licensing ramifications. Whether it be a PBM, payor, or OIG audit, our audit specialists are always available. Don't wait until your rights are jeopardized to pick up the phone.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Resolving Prescription “Red Flags” Is No Longer Optional: Federal Scrutiny Tightens on Controlled-Substance Dispensing
Pharmacists must resolve “red flags” under the Controlled Substances Act’s corresponding-responsibility requirements before dispensing controlled substances. Overlooking warning signs, such as cash-paid, high-dose opioid prescriptions—can now trigger False Claims Act liability and massive penalties, as demonstrated by Walgreens’ $350 million settlement in April 2025.
Read More >>9th Circuit’s Landmark EKRA Ruling—What Providers Should Know
On July 11, 2025, the 9th Circuit upheld a laboratory operator’s convictions for violating EKRA by paying marketing agents to mislead providers into providing patient referrals for medically unnecessary blood tests. In this article, we analyze the 9th Circuit’s ruling and what it means for the future of EKRA enforcement.
Read More >>Collateral Consequences Mount Quickly After Adverse DEA Inspection
Adverse findings during a DEA inspection can trigger a chain reaction of serious consequences for pharmacies, including increasing fines, suspension or revocation of DEA registrations and pharmacy licenses, costly False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuits, and potential criminal liability.
Read More >>Heath Law Alliance Secures Reversal of a Medicaid Payment Suspension
Health Law Alliance successfully secured a full reversal of a Medi-Cal payment suspension for a California pharmacy, overturning speculative allegations made by the Department of Health Care Services. This case highlights the firm’s ability to protect healthcare providers against unjust enforcement actions and the critical value of experienced legal counsel in Medicaid and insurance disputes.
Read More >>