We are humbled to announce that the Attorney General for Massachusetts recently appointed HLA's Nancy Coffey to serve as an independent monitor for the State in connection with a recent pharmacy settlement. Please join us in congratulating Nancy on this noteworthy achievement.
Background on Monitorships
We have written extensively about how PBM audits can lead to collateral consequences, including referral to state Medicaid agencies and Boards of Pharmacy. Accordingly, PBM audits need to be handled with extreme care, particularly when dealing with the larger PBMs or payors, most of whom cultivate close relationships with state and federal agencies.
Monitors are helpful for negotiating settlements with government agencies in cases involving alleged fraud, waste or abuse (FWA). In particular, government agencies may seek licensing sanctions to prevent conduct from recurring. The use of a monitor provides the government a level of oversight and assurance that drastic remedies, such as exclusion, are unnecessary.
Areas in Which a Monitor Can Help
HHS-OIG historically has relied on outside monitors in cases involving alleged healthcare fraud. OIG frequently will not require exclusion if the individual or entity agrees to an "integrity agreement." Such an agreement typically involves a three-year period in which the monitor oversees compliance enhancements and conducts periodic claims audits.
DEA also has increased reliance on monitors involving controlled substance violations. For example, McKesson's 2017 settlement with the Department of Justice and DEA required the appointment of an independent outside monitor over the company's suspicious order monitoring program, which HLA's founding partner, Anthony Mahajan, helped to build.
Finally, wholesalers have accepted that a pharmacy's use of an independent monitor may alleviate controlled substance concerns. After all, distributors are required to conduct due diligence of their customers and report suspicious orders. If the distributor is able to rely on an outside monitor to verify DEA compliance, all parties benefit.
Nancy Coffey's Expertise
Nancy has extensive healthcare background and expertise. A former high-ranking DEA official, Nancy deeply understands how government agencies conduct investigations and the considerations involved. She also appreciates challenges from the industry side, having served as an expert in opioid and other healthcare fraud cases. Based on the perspective she brings to the table, Nancy's involvement often tips the scales in our clients' favor, resulting in successful settlements.
Common PBM Audit Triggers and How to Avoid Them
Guide independent pharmacies in recognizing and proactively managing specific behaviors and operational trends that commonly lead to PBM audits. This article will offer a detailed watchlist of PBM audit triggers and present practical, actionable steps for minimizing risks of audit findings and compliance issues.
Read More >>Navigating Informed Consent Requirements in Telehealth: A Provider’s Guide
We examine the complex requirements and risks associated with informed consent for telehealth providers. The article provides actionable advice on navigating the regulatory landscape and practical steps to ensure legal compliance and patient safety.
Read More >>Pennsylvania Board Closes Investigation of HLA Client with No Action
Telemedicine business models may prompt regulatory scrutiny, including board investigations. In this case, HLA's experienced defense attorneys successfully resolved a three-year, multi-state investigation with no licensing or other implications.
Read More >>Department of Justice Declines to Prosecute HLA Client for Alleged $6M Fraud
After the Department of Justice threatened to indict our client for involvement in an alleged $6M healthcare fraud, we stood firm and our tenacious advocacy ultimately convinced the Strike Force to decline prosecution, representing a complete win for HLA's client.
Read More >>