
Over the past year, Over-the-Counter (OTC) cards have been subject to increased scrutiny and enforcement. We previously highlighted this trend in the context of government investigations. Now, however, payors and PBMs are auditing OTC compliance, with severe penalties at stake.
Payors Promote OTC Cards Heavily
OTC cards are prepaid debit cards issued by plan sponsors to beneficiaries that can be used to purchase eligible healthcare products, such as non-prescription medications, vitamins, and first aid supplies.
Plan sponsors actively promote OTC cards to potential beneficiaries as an incentive for individuals to choose their plan over others. As a result of these promotions, patients have certain expectations over the use of these cards.
At the same time, however, these incentives place pharmacists in a difficult position when patients demand ineligible items, as is often the case.
OTC Cards Have Been the Subject of Federal Enforcement
In a prior article, we highlighted how federal prosecutors have used OTC non-compliance as the basis of criminal charges. You can access that article HERE.
Specifically, although OTC cards are not used for items or services that are reimbursed by government payors, prosecutors have alleged that pharmacies have offered "kickbacks" to patients by allowing them to exchange their OTC card value for ineligible items, including supermarket coupons and front-end sundries.
OTC Card Usage is Now Being Audited by PBMs and Payors
More recently, the enforcement environment around OTC cards has shifted to the private sector, with payors and PBMs auditing for non-compliance in this area. OTC audits typically do not arise from data analytics, but rather from customer complaints. In highly competitive areas, those complaints may even be filed by your competitors!
It is therefore critical that pharmacies understand their rights with respect to requests for documents and information relating to OTC cards.
For example, network pharmacies are forced to agree to lopsided terms in provider manuals and enrollment forms with respect to the processing of pharmacy claims. OTC cards, however, are not pharmacy claims and are not adjudicated by a PBM. In other words, different obligations and rights apply to audits in this area than audits of pharmacy claims.
Implement an OTC Audit Protection Plan Now, Not Later
Given increased audit enforcement trends, pharmacies are well-advised to implement an audit protection plan applicable to OTC and other potential PBM audit vulnerabilities, including well-designed polices and procedures, ongoing staff training and education, and internal monitoring or test audits. Such planning is well worth the time and investment.
HLA's Defense Attorneys Have OTC Enforcement Experience
As former federal prosecutors and state regulators, HLA's experienced defense lawyers have extensive experience defending pharmacies against OTC allegations in federal probes and PBM audits. We are available to provide comprehensive legal guidance on OTC card compliance, conduct internal audits and risk assessments, and offer tailored training programs and compliance protocols to enhance staff awareness and adherence to all relevant legal and regulatory requirements related to the proper utilization of OTC cards. Contact us for a complimentary consultation today.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
How DME Suppliers Can Maintain Compliance with Medicare Enrollment Requirements
If you are a Durable Medical Equipment (DME) supplier and you are fearful of being scrutinized by CMS or the National Provider Enrollment contractors for violating the onerous Medicare enrollment standards, we hope this article will help. It lays out the essential steps to maintain compliance with Medicare's enrollment requirements. We break down the complex regulations surrounding Medicare enrollment standards, covering everything from initial enrollment and accreditation to revalidation and reporting changes, and tells providers to reach out to Health Law Alliance if they are seeking advice.
Read More >>OIG Issues Advisory Opinion 25-03, A Roadmap for Compliant Telehealth Staffing Models
On June 6, 2025, the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General issued Advisory Opinion 25-03, offering key compliance guidance for telehealth arrangements involving the leasing of health care providers and other administrative services to a physician-owned professional corporation (PC). Learn more about the opinion and what it tells us about the future of telehealth regulatory compliance.
Read More >>HLA Wins Full Reversal of PBM Audit Findings for Maryland Pharmacy
Health Law Alliance achieved full reversal of final audit findings for a Maryland pharmacy—just one of numerous victories our attorneys has achieved for our clients. Learn more about the stunning reversal and how Health Law Alliance’s tenacious advocacy can help your pharmacy in PBM disputes.
Read More >>HLA Attorney Anthony Mahajan Secures Major Victory Over Cardinal as Federal Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Independent Pharmacies
Health Law Alliance secured a major win for independent pharmacies with the dismissal of Cardinal Health’s lawsuit, exposing it as a baseless attempt to intimidate smaller providers. This outcome reinforces the firm’s commitment to protecting healthcare businesses from corporate overreach.
Read More >>