.png){kind=spacer}
Our client, a Philadelphia pharmacy, was referred to the Prosecution Division of the Pennsylvania Department of State's Office of Chief Counsel following a PBM audit that noted violations. After the pharmacy retained HLA, the State declined to prosecute the case.
PBM Audits May Result in Referrals
We have written extensively about how PBM audits can lead to collateral consequences, including referral to state Medicaid agencies and Boards of Pharmacy. Accordingly, PBM audits need to be handled with extreme care, particularly when dealing with the larger PBMs or payors, most of whom cultivate close relationships with state and federal agencies.
In fact, PBM and payors often hire claims auditors and investigators from agencies such as the Department of Insurance or Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. In Pennsylvania, Keystone maintains particularly close relationships with federal and state agencies.
If you would like to read more about PBM audits and important considerations, please sign-up HERE for our complimentary, 10-part PBM Audit Guide.
HLA's Defense Strategy
Because our attorneys have worked as federal and state regulators, we understand the considerations at play. Overall, we use that insight to present our client's narrative in a convincing and compelling manner to assuage any regulatory concerns. In addition, it is always important to provide convincing evidence that the conduct at issue is isolated, and will not recur.
State Officials Declined to Prosecute
Based on our factual and legal arguments, the State declined to take further action and closed its file. We are grateful to the State for their consideration, as we strive to achieve successful outcomes as early in the process as possible. This approach is not only efficient for all involved, but spares the stress and anxiety involved in a drawn-out dispute.
With HLA's assistance, our client achieved a speedy and efficient final resolution, and can now refocus his energy where it should be, on running his business.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Health Law Alliance Secures Major Victory as Federal Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Independent Pharmacies
Health Law Alliance secured a major win for independent pharmacies with the dismissal of Cardinal Health’s lawsuit, exposing it as a baseless attempt to intimidate smaller providers. This outcome reinforces the firm’s commitment to protecting healthcare businesses from corporate overreach.
Read More >>DOJ’s 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown: What it Means for Telehealth Providers
The DOJ’s 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown charged 324 people in schemes totaling $14 billion in intended losses, including $1.17 billion tied to telemedicine and genetic‑testing fraud that implicated 49 defendants - signaling the government’s continued crack‑down on virtual‑care abuses. The surge in criminal and civil actions, coupled with CMS suspensions and the new DOJ‑HHS False Claims Act Working Group, warns telehealth providers to rigorously audit their compliance practices or risk severe penalties and exclusion from federal programs.
Read More >>Telehealth Audit Season: OIG Found 7 Percent Error Rate in Pandemic-Era E/M Billing
A 2024 OIG study found that 7% of E/M services billed during the pandemic were noncompliant with Medicare billing requirements. We break down OIG’s findings and explain what they mean in an era where RPM audits are on the rise.
Read More >>Health Law Alliance Earns Reinstatement for DME Supplier Whose Medicare Billing Privileges Were Unjustly Revoked
Due to Health Law Alliance’s advocacy, a prominent DME vendor in Texas had their billing privileges reinstated this week, without having to jump through the arduous, costly hoops of a fair hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge or a Departmental Appeals Board review.
Read More >>
