.png)
Our client, a Philadelphia pharmacy, was referred to the Prosecution Division of the Pennsylvania Department of State's Office of Chief Counsel following a PBM audit that noted violations. After the pharmacy retained HLA, the State declined to prosecute the case.
PBM Audits May Result in Referrals
We have written extensively about how PBM audits can lead to collateral consequences, including referral to state Medicaid agencies and Boards of Pharmacy. Accordingly, PBM audits need to be handled with extreme care, particularly when dealing with the larger PBMs or payors, most of whom cultivate close relationships with state and federal agencies.
In fact, PBM and payors often hire claims auditors and investigators from agencies such as the Department of Insurance or Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. In Pennsylvania, Keystone maintains particularly close relationships with federal and state agencies.
If you would like to read more about PBM audits and important considerations, please sign-up HERE for our complimentary, 10-part PBM Audit Guide.
HLA's Defense Strategy
Because our attorneys have worked as federal and state regulators, we understand the considerations at play. Overall, we use that insight to present our client's narrative in a convincing and compelling manner to assuage any regulatory concerns. In addition, it is always important to provide convincing evidence that the conduct at issue is isolated, and will not recur.
State Officials Declined to Prosecute
Based on our factual and legal arguments, the State declined to take further action and closed its file. We are grateful to the State for their consideration, as we strive to achieve successful outcomes as early in the process as possible. This approach is not only efficient for all involved, but spares the stress and anxiety involved in a drawn-out dispute.
With HLA's assistance, our client achieved a speedy and efficient final resolution, and can now refocus his energy where it should be, on running his business.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
California Hospice Fraud Crackdown: What it Means for Providers & How to Protect Your Business
California’s hospice fraud crackdown is only the beginning of what CMS and Medi-Cal regulators have claimed will be many more cases brought against hospice facilities and home health agencies. Providers who do not timely respond to a suspension or revocation may waive important rights. Act now to protect your business and reputation from governmental overreach based on data mining and other unreliable sources.
Read More >>The WISeR Model: A New Era of Prior Authorization and Audit Risks for Wound Care
On January 1, 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) officially launched the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model. This initiative is not just another administrative hurdle; it is a technology-driven enforcement overhaul aimed directly at the wound care industry.
Read More >>OMIG Audit Defense New York: What the 2026 Work Plan Means for Providers
Every year, the New York Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG) releases its Work Plan outlining enforcement priorities. The 2026 plan sends a clear signal that Medicaid providers in New York are entering a far more aggressive enforcement environment.
Read More >>PBM Member Denial Audit Findings: A Growing Threat to Pharmacies
Pharmacies undergoing a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) audit are typically prepared to address inventory discrepancies and documentation issues. What many are not prepared for, however, is the increasing use of PBM member denial findings, allegations that a patient claims they did not receive and/or did not authorize the dispensing of a medication for which a claim was submitted.
Read More >>
